Cover for Searching for Margarito Temprana
Searching for Margarito Temprana
Paused at the edge of a video call, late afternoon light catching a moment of quiet urgency. Photo-realistic image generated by Gemini.

Wednesday Lumen: Writing into What You Don’t Know Exercise

Ignorance creates speed. The less the character knows, the faster the scene should move, and the more ruthlessly the prose should refuse to slow down and explain why.

Key practice techniques you will activate by completing this writing prompt:

First, strategic ignorance. The writing refuses mastery and lets the character move through what they do not yet understand. Confusion becomes productive pressure rather than a flaw to be corrected.

Second, permission-based momentum. The scene advances without self-correction, apology, or explanation. Discovery happens through motion, not planning.

Third, learning through consequence. Insight arrives because something goes wrong and forces adjustment. No lessons. No summaries.

Two-hour writing exercise

Writing prompt, 500 words

Write a real-time scene in which a character must perform a task they believe they should already know how to do. The task matters now. Someone is waiting. Something can be lost. The character cannot pause to look anything up, ask for help, or reflect on why they do not know what they are doing.

The task must be physical. Hands, timing, balance, or coordination must drive the scene. Ignorance appears only through action: a wrong grip, a delayed response, an incorrect assumption carried too far. No interior explanations of embarrassment, growth, or learning.

The scene ends at the instant the character understands something essential but incomplete about themselves or the task. The task itself does not need to be finished.

Write continuously for 45 minutes. Take a 10-minute break. Revise once, cutting at least 15 percent. Remove anything that explains what the scene already shows.

Examples of viable tasks include administering medication without understanding the measurement system, translating in a language the character only partially knows, or repairing a familiar object that suddenly behaves differently.

Strong and weak execution

A weak response explains the character’s insecurity, names the theme of learning, and reassures the reader that progress is happening. Mistakes are summarized. The task becomes symbolic rather than dangerous. The ending offers a lesson.

A strong response lets the character reach for the wrong tool, hesitate at the wrong moment, and double down on a faulty assumption. The body moves faster than the mind. Each error sharpens the stakes. Insight arrives through consequence, not comfort.

Evaluation criteria

The scene exposes ignorance through behavior without naming it. Forward motion never stalls for reflection. Errors escalate pressure rather than resolve it. The ending offers partial clarity, not competence. Explanatory language has been cut to necessity.

Workshop and revision questions

Where does the character act before thinking, and where does thought interrupt too early?

Which sentence protects the character from embarrassment?

Which physical detail carries the most weight?

What happens if the final realization is delayed by three more actions?

Which cut leaves the character most exposed?

Recommended reading

George Saunders, “Tenth of December.” Study how uncertainty drives action and how understanding arrives through risk, not explanation.

AI Disclosure Statement:

This writing prompt was created in collaboration with ChatGPT, an AI model by OpenAI, to support creative practice. ChatGPT assisted with idea generation and drafting; the final text was edited by the author. The illustration was created using Google Gemini.


Discover more from Rolando Andrés Ramos

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a comment